Epic
Epic
Go to Homepage Go to Contact page Go to Client extranet
About us
What we do
Sectors
Research and Resource Centre
  White papers
  Email newsletter
  Epic Think Tanks
  Case studies
  Show reports
  Book reviews
  Links
  Leaders
  Research
Jobs
Investors
News
 
*

Hall of Fame

Skinner (1904 -1990)

B.F. Skinner, the American psychologist, promoted pure behaviourism. Only observable phenomena are allowed as evidence, in this case stimuli and their behavioural responses. No mental or cognitive events were to be considered admissible, as they were unobservable. His experimental work concentrated on animals and the famous Skinner Box, where rats had to press levers to get food. Although he was not averse to human experimentation, the claim that Skinner raised his own daughter in a "Skinner box" and that she sued her father, ultimately committing suicide, is an urban myth.

Operant conditioning

Learning, for Skinner, was the ability of an organism to learn to operate in its environment (operant conditioning). If a behaviour is reinforced through repeated stimuli it is more likely to be repeated. An important facet of this theory is that positive reinforcement is more powerful than negative reinforcement i.e. carrots are better than sticks. A problem with relying just on observable behaviour is that what one takes as evidence of reinforcement is the repeated behaviour itself. The evidence is therefore self-fulfilling. Withdrawing a reinforced behaviour also leads to the extinction of the behaviour.

Teaching machines and Programmed Instruction

Skinner was profoundly affected when he witnessed poor teaching in his daughter’s maths class. The teacher, he thought, was violating almost everything we know about learning. Rather than adapting to the ability of the child, they were being forced through sheets of problems with no immediate feedback on each problem. The teacher was clearly not shaping any of the 20-30 children in the class. They clearly required help in reinforcement.

That same afternoon he built his ‘teaching machine’, allowing learners to practice already learnt skills. Within three years he had developed programmed instruction, which broke material down into small steps, and as performance improved, less and less support was provided. As this was before the age of computers, most of this was produced in books, where getting the answers was all too easy. His article Teaching Machines published in Science (1958) is still a relevant read today and in 1968 he published The Technology of Teaching, a collection of writings on technology and education. His analysis of what sequencing and feedback was required was way ahead of his time and technology.

Behaviourism and social engineering

One unfortunate consequence of his strict behaviourism was the development of the technology of conditioning; "teaching machines" and other techniques to shape human behaviour on contraception and so on. Walden Two (1961) was an attempt to describe and prescribe this behaviourist utopia in the form of a novel. Interestingly, this was to creep into parenting manuals and other social engineering. There are still elements of this in social engineering policies and techniques practiced by governments today. Attempts to put Walden Two into practice did not succeed spectacularly but one commune is still going in Mexico!

Conclusion

The weaknesses of behaviourism are now well known. Obsessively ignoring all internal, cognitive mental events led to a relevant, but narrow account of learning. As the post-coital behaviourist couple joke goes, ‘That was great for you, how was it for me’. Its over-dependence on external stimuli along with a tendency to take animal experiments and extend them to humans led to a suffocating, straightjacketed view of psychology. In The Behaviour of Organisms, only two were mentioned; rats and pigeons. This reliance on animal experimentation was far too narrow. To ignore the brain and internal events was to ignore the vast amount of evidence now available to experimental and evolutionary psychologists. We have motivation, emotions, instincts, beliefs, memory and many other facets of the brain which show that it is far from being a blank slate, etched by the environment.

Skinner’s behaviourism is now dead in psychology, initially by Chomsky, who, showed that behaviourism could not account for language learning. However its modern form, associatism, a learning theory used by most neural network theorists, lives on. The danger is still to base government policy on the idea that the brain is a totally malleable entity waiting for the appropriate stimuli and reinforcement.

Bibliography

Skinner, B. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms
Skinner, B. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.
Skinner, B. (1961, repr. 1976). Walden Two
Skinner, B. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Crofts.
Skinner, B. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity
Skinner, B. (1974, repr. 1976). About Behaviorism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._F._Skinner
Encyclopedia article

http://www.bfskinner.org/index.asp
Skinner Foundation

http://www.snopes.com/science/skinner.asp
Urban myth about Skinner’s box


 
Downloads

Corporate brochure: E-Learning at Epic
Data sheets: Epic Consulting, Accessibility Lab, Arena, Blended Learning ROI Calculator (‘The Blender’), Epic P2P, Hosting, Thought Leadership Programme, Testing (x4)
White papers: Blended Learning, Blended Learning in Practice
Survey report: The Future of E-Learning

Go to downloads
 
* * * *
* Copyright Epic Performance Improvement Limited 2007. All rights reserved. Home   |   Contact us   |   Jobs at Epic   |   Client extranet   |   Press information *