Epic
Epic
Go to Homepage Go to Contact page Go to Client extranet
About us
What we do
Sectors
Research and Resource Centre
  White papers
  Email newsletter
  Epic Think Tanks
  Case studies
  Book reviews
  Links
  Leaders
  Research
Jobs
*

Epic Think Tank

Blending Learning and Knowledge Management


2. Making the tacit explicit

A distinction is commonly made in KM circles between tacit and explicit knowledge. Explicit knowledge is everything that is written down or otherwise encoded within an organisation's documents, systems and processes. Tacit knowledge, by contrast, exists largely in employee's heads.

Since the invention of writing, back in the dawn of time, organisations have had more or less effective systems for dealing with their explicit knowledge. In historical times we had the company library, and more recently still, document management systems. But it is the far more elusive entity of tacit knowledge that is the focus of much of the heat in 'KM' currently.

One particularly tantalising question is how amenable this form of knowledge might be to systems designed for handling explicit knowledge.

Such a system is the following widely-used model for the activities that make up knowledge management:

  1. Identifying
  2. Gathering
  3. Refining
  4. Re-using

In the case of tacit knowledge, one would have to assume that somewhere between step two and step three, the tacit stuff undergoes some form of conversion process that transforms it into the explicit variety - i.e. it gets written down, or in some other way codified.

But surely there's a paradox here. If we strip knowledge of its personal dimension - if we take it out of the heads of our people and put it into a database - are we not converting it back into mere information? And does it not lose something vital in the process?

The problem is that information does not magically reconvert itself back into knowledge once it enters a new head. Terms like 'knowledge capture' make the process of transcribing tacit knowledge seem seductively straightforward, whereas in actual fact it is fraught with all sorts of difficulties.

Which leads us to pose the first really challenging question that this discussion threw up: what if certain types of knowledge really can't be separated from the context in which the knowledge exists - from either the head within which the knowledge reposes or from the situation that originally formed it?

Next>>

Intro: Sven, VBM and the book under the counter
1. The personality of knowledge
2. Learning from war stories
3. The book under the counter
4. The convergence of learning and knowledge management
5. Reward systems in the culture club
6. Modelling the tall poppy
7. Value based management and Sven's men
8. The Odyssey as quality manual

Back to features

See also:
Epic Thinking: click here to receive free monthly newsletter
 
Downloads

Corporate brochure: E-Learning at Epic
Data sheets: Epic Consulting, Accessibility Lab, Arena, Blended Learning ROI Calculator (‘The Blender’), Epic P2P, Hosting, Thought Leadership Programme, Testing (x4)
White papers: Blended Learning, Blended Learning in Practice
Survey report: The Future of E-Learning

Go to downloads
 
* * * *
* Copyright Epic Performance Improvement Limited 2008. All rights reserved. Home   |   Contact us   |   Jobs at Epic   |   Client extranet   |   Press information *