Epic
Epic
Go to Homepage Go to Contact page Go to Client extranet
About us
What we do
Sectors
Research and Resource Centre
  White papers
  Email newsletter
  Epic Think Tanks
  Case studies
  Book reviews
  Links
  Leaders
  Research
Jobs
About us
What we do
Sectors
  Education
  Health
  Defence
  Central government
  Regional government
  Local government
  Finance
  Retail / FMCG
  Telcos & IT
  Pharmaceuticals
  Media
  Utilities / Oil & Gas
Research and Resource Centre
Jobs
 
*

White paper

Evaluation and e-learning

Kirkpatrick, schmerkpatrick

In Techniques for Evaluation Training Programmes (1959) and Evaluating Training Programmes: The Four Levels (1994), Donald Kirkpatrick proposed a standard approach to the evaluation of training that has become the de facto standard in the industry.

But how well has this 44 year-old model stood the test of time?

Some, like Steve Kerr (leadership guru and Chief Learning Officer at Goldman Sachs) would like to see Kirkpatrick junked. In his opinion, Kirkpatrick asks all the wrong questions.

Kerr is one of many who question whether we should evaluate at all, arguing that the task is to create the motivation and context for good learning and knowledge sharing; not to treat learning as an auditable commodity.

In this white paper, originally issued in 2001 and now extensively revised and updated, Donald Clark argues that while Kirkpatrick offers a simple and for the most part sensible schema, serious doubts must now exist about its continued efficacy. In practice, it can prove too costly, disruptive and statistically weak to implement. Following a detailed critique of Kirkpatrick, he outlines alternative strategies for evaluation, based on alignment with business measures rather than formal evaluative techniques.

White Paper: Evaluation of learning

Order your free copy

Summary of contents:

  • Why we don't evaluate
    • Disinterest
    • Cost
    • Disruption
    • Difficulty
    • Statistically weak
    • Fear
  • What is the Kirkpatrick model?
    • Level 1 - Reaction
    • Level 2 - Learning
    • Level 3 - Behaviour
    • Level 4 - Results
    • The evaluation paradox
  • Shortcomings of Kirkpartick model
    • General shortcomings
    • Level 1 shortcomings - Reaction
    • Level 2 shortcomings - Learning
    • Level 3 shortcomings - Behaviour
    • Level 4 shortcomings - Results
  • Evaluation made easy
    • Should you evaluate at all?
    • Align business case with business objectives
    • Why evaluate?
    • When to evaluate?
    • How to evaluate?
      • Pre launch evaluation
      • Comparative studies
    • Return on investment
  • Other Epic e-learning white papers
  • Epic thinking

See also:
Other white papers
Consultancy at Epic

Epic Thinking: click here to receive free monthly newsletter
 
Downloads

Corporate brochure: E-Learning at Epic
Data sheets: Epic Consulting, Accessibility Lab, Arena, Blended Learning ROI Calculator (‘The Blender’), Epic P2P, Hosting, Thought Leadership Programme, Testing (x4)
White papers: Blended Learning, Blended Learning in Practice
Survey report: The Future of E-Learning

Go to downloads
 
* * * *
* Copyright Epic Performance Improvement Limited 2008. All rights reserved. Home   |   Contact us   |   Jobs at Epic   |   Client extranet   |   Press information *